MediumHash Maps

4Sum II

Explanation & Solution

Description

Given four integer arrays nums1, nums2, nums3, and nums4 all of length n, return the number of tuples (i, j, k, l) such that:

nums1[i] + nums2[j] + nums3[k] + nums4[l] == 0

Input:nums1 = [1, 2], nums2 = [-2, -1], nums3 = [-1, 2], nums4 = [0, 2]
0
1
1
2
0
-2
1
-1
0
-1
1
2
0
0
1
2

Output: 2

Explanation: The two tuples are:

1. (0, 0, 0, 1) → nums1[0] + nums2[0] + nums3[0] + nums4[1] = 1 + (-2) + (-1) + 2 = 0

2. (1, 1, 0, 0) → nums1[1] + nums2[1] + nums3[0] + nums4[0] = 2 + (-1) + (-1) + 0 = 0

Constraints

  • n == nums1.length == nums2.length == nums3.length == nums4.length
  • 1 <= n <= 200
  • -2²⁸ <= nums1[i], nums2[i], nums3[i], nums4[i] <= 2²⁸

Approach

Hash Maps pattern

1. Compute All Pairwise Sums of nums1 and nums2

  • Create a hash map sumMap to store every possible sum a + b where a comes from nums1 and b comes from nums2
  • For each sum, record how many pairs produce that sum

2. Check Complementary Sums from nums3 and nums4

  • For every pair (c, d) from nums3 and nums4, compute target = -(c + d)
  • Look up target in the hash map — if it exists, the value tells us how many (a, b) pairs from step 1 combine with this (c, d) to sum to 0
  • Add that count to the running total

3. Return the Total Count

  • After iterating through all pairs from nums3 and nums4, the accumulated count is the answer

Key Insight

  • Splitting the four arrays into two groups of two reduces the problem from O(n⁴) brute force to O(n²)
  • We precompute all sums from the first two arrays, then for each sum from the last two arrays we look up the complementary value in O(1)
Time
O(n²)two nested loops of size n, twice
Space
O(n²)the hash map can store up to n² distinct sums

Visualization

Input:
[1, 2]
1021

No animation available

Left (L)Right (R)ConvergedDone
0 steps

Solution Code